img(height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=2939831959404383&ev=PageView&noscript=1")

Delays in the planning system demand open dialogue

As the Planning and Infrastructure Bill goes through Parliament, an architect argues that legislation alone will not fix planning’s real problems

Extensions of time for planning can make you feel like you are holding onto projects by your fingertips: a symptom of a system under strain.
Extensions of time for planning can make you feel like you are holding onto projects by your fingertips: a symptom of a system under strain. Credit: Istock | solstock

It’s Monday, and my inbox has another two extension of time (EoT) requests waiting for me. This is happening so often that planning departments have stopped typing out the full term. 

The planning officers – who still haven’t even picked up the application, 12 weeks after submission – in no way invite dialogue, just a token reply of, ‘Yes, we accept the delay so that you don’t just put it to one side.’ Our local department proudly proclaims that officers meet 90 per cent of their applications on time. What goes unsaid is that if you don’t accept the revised deadline, you may never get a response at all. One client tested this and is still yet to have a response; in the end we resorted to a new application and agreeing the EoT. 

Things that could have easily been solved earlier in the process become immovable stumbling blocks which require re-consultation or, worse, resubmission. It’s easy to be sceptical that certain officers have learned that time is a powerful weapon. 

By stalling discussions, requesting excessive revisions, or letting applications linger, they can entrench their position to wear down agents and applicants. The prolonged appeal process acts as a further deterrent, making it easier to reject proposals without having to justify decisions via meaningful engagement. 

Under-resourced and overwhelmed planning departments

Then the first coffee kicks in, and I remember the deep-rooted struggles of planning departments. Under-resourced and overwhelmed, they face an ever-growing list of responsibilities to ensure compliance, often while having to cope with outdated systems and limited staff. 

The sheer volume of applications, policy updates and legal requirements creates a relentless workload, stretching planners to their limits. What should be a structured, efficient process instead becomes a battle against bureaucracy, with professionals forced to balance public interest, developer pressure, and government mandates – all while lacking the necessary support.

On top of these challenges, a significant portion of planning fees now goes to the Planning Portal. Designed as an affordable solution for cash-strapped departments struggling with IT, it has since cemented its position as a majority provider. 

At the time of writing, householder applications cost £258 (local authority fee) plus a £70 fee to the Planning Portal – an extra 27 per cent – for an application type that accounts for 50 per cent of all submissions nationally. For some smaller householder applications, the portal adds as much as 70 per cent on top of the local authority fee.

Since the fees were updated on 1st of April 2025 with the standard householder fee at £528 and the service charge at £70.83 + VAT (£85 in total) the service charge is around 13% of the total fee (17% including VAT). This percentage goes up for small household applications of £262, adding 32% on top of the local authority fee (including VAT).

If time pressures are leading to strategic inaction, better communication could ensure that delays do not replace reasoned decision-making

This fee is justified by the Planning Portal’s need to develop its own business. However, even a basic review of the filed accounts for the TerraQuest company which runs the portal (PortalPlanQuest) shows pre-tax profits of £1.7 million. 

According to government statistics, annual planning application numbers have fallen by 36 per cent over the last five-years. Rather than a decrease in construction activity, it could be that people are tailoring projects to avoid the need for planning permission or simply choosing not to apply at all – gambling on the likelihood of weak enforcement, which is all too evident in many areas.

Regardless of the commercialisation of a statutory regulatory body, delays in the planning system should not be used as an excuse to avoid engagement. While planning departments are under huge strain, the solution lies in greater transparency and a return to open dialogue. 

If time pressures are leading to strategic inaction, better communication could ensure that delays do not replace reasoned decision-making. A planning system that is slow but considered is far preferable to one that is slow and obstructive. 

The architect-author of this piece has chosen to remain anonymous

 

 

Latest

Repurpose two market town buildings for the community, extend an historic subterranean venue, create a garden zone in a city square – some of the latest architecture contracts and competitions from across the industry

Latest: Derbyshire market town refurb

Three very different – but equally indulgent – bathrooms highlight the reinforcing impact that tailored features can bring, finds Pamela Buxton

Three very different – and indulgent – bathrooms highlight the reinforcing impact of tailored features

Achieving meaningful healthcare reform will be a tough challenge – but even if not all promises are delivered on, Labour’s plans for neighbourhood health services will fuel growth in construction

Even if not all promises are delivered on, Labour's plans for neighbourhood health services will fuel growth in construction

Rural sole practitioner Daniel Mattholie of Dig Architects talks through the specification choices and costs relating to Hillside, his low-impact home at Millbrook in Cornwall

Daniel Mattholie of Dig Architects on the specification choices and costs of his low-impact Cornish home

The Luxembourg-born architect had an incisive wit and could be uncompromising in the pursuit of his ideas – an approach exemplified by his masterplanning of the Dorset new town Poundbury – but he was also a man of warmth and generosity

The Luxembourg-born architect's incisive wit and uncompromising approach belied his generous nature