While the post-war rebuilding effort concentrated on housing the most people for the lowest cost, emigré Walter Segal developed a system of self-build council housing that put tenants in control of the design of their new home. Segal, described as a ‘combination of an intensely practical architect and an intellectual’, rejected the modernist steel and concrete of his peers instead favouring traditional timber framing. His first commission, a wooden holiday cabin in Switzerland in 1932, experimented with principles that became the Segal Method, but it was not until the 1970s that his ideas for low-rise, high density homes could be realised when Lewisham Council offered him four sites with terrain unsuitable for conventional building methods. Anyone from the Council’s waiting list was eligible to apply for the scheme and the successful candidates’ names were picked from a hat. No previous building experience was needed, though special preparatory evening classes were held, and Segal worked closely with each household. Although built using the same basic kit, the houses were designed to allow some individuality and each is unique to its inhabitant.
- Key Worker Housing, Eddington, CambridgeKey Worker Housing, Eddington, Cambridge
- A chorus of voices offer a fresh look at AfricaA chorus of voices offer a fresh look at Africa
- Bauman Lyons gets heritage mill back to work as Museum of Ma...Bauman Lyons gets heritage mill back to work as Museum of Making
- How the last six Stirling contenders tackled sustainabilityHow the last six Stirling contenders tackled sustainability
- News catch-up: Mayor of London’s combustible ban provokes an...News catch-up: Mayor of London’s combustible ban provokes anger by including timber
- RIBA National Awards set a high bar after a difficult yearRIBA National Awards set a high bar after a difficult year
- Webinar: PiP health, wellbeing and building designWebinar: PiP health, wellbeing and building design
- Notre-Dame and Al-Aqsa: why was the response so different?Notre-Dame and Al-Aqsa: why was the response so different?