img(height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=2939831959404383&ev=PageView&noscript=1")

A Feed - In Pushmi Pullyu

Words:
Jan-Carlos Kucharek

The latest figures on solar energy make for painful reading. Since the coalition government’s decision to cut feed-in tariffs by over half after December 12th 2011, solar electricity installation has all but collapsed in the UK.

The Microgeneration Certification Scheme, which registers all solar installations highlighted that since the December cut-off point, they had seen a drop of 97%, from nearly 30,000 to 934. Despite the fact that this might reflect a last-minute rush of applications, the numbers are still jaw-dropping. 

And unfortunately, they are not the only big bad ones. Last month contractor Carillion put 4,500 people on notice of statutory redundancy- most of them presumably employees of the former renewable services provider Eaga, which the firm took a punt on last year- to the tune of £306M.

Despite Friends of the Earth’s and the UK solar industry’s successful legal challenge, where the High Court ruled that the tariff cut was ‘legally flawed’, on Wednesday Energy Minister Gregg Barker tweeted his intention to mount an appeal on January 13th to have the decision overturned. All at the taxpayers expense.

But how is this tariff cut actually in the public interest? Partisan interests of the industry aside (although Friends of the Earth figures put job losses here at around 29,000, with a loss of over £230M in taxes to the public purse) what about the UK’s legally binding commitments to cut its carbon emissions 80% by 2050? Energy minister Chris Huhne even signed-up to these cuts with great fanfare in May last year. The cut in FiTs won’t help this.

What is so wrong about this state of affairs is the fact that the government’s left hand doesn’t seem to know what the right is doing. What Huhne commits to, Barker removes himself from, using us, the taxpayers, to facilitate it. And most galling of all is The George Osborne driven ‘Planning Policy Framework’, with its ‘presumption in favour of sustainable development’. But given latest moves, how is its sustainability to be addressed by architects, the industry, or indeed, anyone? One has to ask of any of these Cabinet members have actually sat down round a table together to think this one through. The whole thing seems symptomatic of the government’s short-term, pushmi-pullyu politics, with wholly divergent policies that collectively hurt a lot but Dolittle. 

But with Barker’s legal challenge happening on a friday, we have to hope, for sanity’s sake, that the day proves particularly portentous. 

Latest

Danish photographer Hjortshøj continues his exploration of the co-dependencies of natural and urban landscapes in his 2018 photograph of Fondazione Prada in Milan

Rasmus Hjortshøj, Fondazione Prada, Milan, 2018

Visiting is coming back on the agenda, so the right doors, windows and the ironmongery to operate them are more critical than ever. There’s lots of choice on PiP’s specified pages

Doors and windows to serve every post-lockdown need

Do fewer applications mean towers are falling out of fashion? Plus inspector reins in PDR, ‘less urban’ plans for new garden village and Barbican residents question disjointed development. Meanwhile, Italy magics Harry Potter into the built environment

Fewer applications, but approvals rise. Plus PDR extreme checked

St Mary’s Calne and Woods Bagot both have something extra in their pockets with the new library in the school orchard

Interior ‘trees’ join those in the orchard alongside

A set of sleek Lifeline Speedlane Swing turnstiles guides workers and visitors into the Stiff + Trevillion office refurbishment above London Cannon Street Station

Lifeline Speedlane Swing turnstiles guide workers into the Stiff + Trevillion office reburbishment