img(height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="")

Fee survey shows rates and charges diverging

Fees are continuing to move up, while hourly rates remain flat. How can it be? Headlines and analysis of the latest figures

History shows there isn’t a direct relationship between hourly rates and fees charged. The latest edition of Architects Fees has been published, the results of a survey which has been conducted among architects of all sizes across the UK continuously for the last 20 years. Respondents provide data on the fees they charged for all the new jobs they received – so these are actual commissions, not just fee bids – and show an upward trend. The same respondents also provide hourly rates data. These rates are not rising so how can the fees for jobs be rising?

Looking back over the trends since this survey began, average hourly rates kept on rising in the 2000s. When the financial crisis hit, hourly rates fell back initially, but then flattened and started to recover. By 2015, hourly rates were higher than they were before the crisis. Since then, rates have flattened again, refusing to move up or down in any consistent or meaningful way.

Contrast this simple pattern with the way average fees have moved. These climbed at a faster rate than hourly rates in the early 2000s, but then fell dramatically as the financial crisis unfolded. Fees, unlike hourly rates, fell to well below their year 2000 level during the crisis but then started to recover and have kept on rising. So the hourly rates line is flatter, and less responsive to shocks, than the average fees line. That’s how we get average hourly rates standing still while average fees are moving up.

Average fees have been pushing up across the board, but in the last 12 months it’s been the commercial and public sectors which have seen the biggest improvement. The research analyses the data as an index, and the Architects’ Fees Index has increased from 112 last year to 115 this. That index – which is based on a wide range of jobs and strips out the effects of building cost inflation – is now at its highest level since the survey started in 1998. While the fees index tumbled sharply during the recession, it recovered slowly and by 2015 it had just exceeded its pre-recession peak. In the last two years, the Index has continued to grow. 

Housing work, particularly small house extensions or alterations, dominates architects’ workloads, and average fees here have increased in the last 12 months but only for refurbishment work. Some of the most convincing upward movements in fees seems to be for larger refurbishment jobs; average fees for minor works remain competitive. The average fees recorded for private housing new build work is slightly lower this year, particularly for smaller jobs. 


A quarter of sole principals charge £99 or more per hour; another quarter charges no more than £63

We’ve looked at how fees have changed over the medium term – the last four years. What’s interesting is that average fees have increased the most in those sectors which already had some of the highest average fees. Refurbishment in private housing and leisure were towards the higher end of average fees in 2014, and both sectors record an improvement in fee levels since then. Taking fees for a £1 million job as an example, average fees for private housing refurbishment work have increased by three percentage points, so the average fee charged for a £1 million refurbishment job this year, 11%, has increased from 8% in 2014. Private housing new build fees have also improved markedly since 2014, as have leisure refurbishment and retail new build. On the negative side we see that average fees for health new build and office refurbishment have fallen back compared with 2014.

The demand for architects’ work in London is such that fees and hourly rates are highest here. Average fees reduce with distance from London in a very direct way. Average fees are about 10% higher than the UK average in London and the South East; and about 10% lower in Northern Ireland, Wales, Scotland and the North of England. Across the Midlands, East Anglia and the South West, average fees are around the UK average. What’s emerged recently is a real narrowing of the differential in average fees between London and the South East. London remains highest, but fees in the South East are coming close to matching those in the capital. This is probably a consequence of house price inflation in the region pushing up demand for residential architectural work. 

Apart from geography, the main factor influencing hourly rates is size of practice. Size has a huge impact on rates – across the board, not just for partners/directors. The average rate for an associate in a three to five person practice is £75; compare this with the average of £98 in a practice with more than 30 staff. An architect with less than five years’ experience, is charged out at £55 in a three to five person practice compared with £71 an hour in a practice with over 30 staff. While it’s clear that large practices charge more than small ones, the group of staff with the biggest variation of hourly rates is mostly within one size group: sole principals. The difference between lower and upper quartile figures among sole principals is massive; a 55% difference. A quarter of sole principals charge £99 or more per hour; but another quarter charge no more than £63. 

That bottom quartile figure is the same rate that a large practice charges for an architectural assistant. Many sole principals will be competing against part-qualified architectural designers.  But can working at such low rates really be the basis for a sustainable business? And given the rapidly increasing numbers of architects emerging enthusiastically into the profession from schools of architecture, or arriving in the UK from overseas, it may be hard to avoid further downward pressure on rates. 

The low pay earned by some sole principals is evidence of this. If sole principals charging these lower rates want to avoid this circular trap, surely the way forward is to start raising hourly rates backed up by the evidence of clever, elegant and successful projects, aimed at convincing clients that using an architect brings tangible benefits.

Aziz Mirza is director of The Fees Bureau
The full findings are available as a printed report or pdf, Architects Fees, or as an online subscription service, The Fees Bureau Calculator


Want to work on one of London’s largest estate regeneration projects, secure the future of a Cornish market town landmark or design new healthcare facilities across England? These are some of the latest architecture contracts and competitions from across the industry

Latest: Architect for Stratford’s Carpenters Estate, Phase 2

The trend for dark finishes - even down to tiny details - is reshaping hotel interiors with designers specifying the deepest greys and anthracites for ironmongery, fixtures and fittings

Designers are specifying architectural ironmongery, fixtures and fittings in deep, dark finishes for their hotel commissions

There’s a spiritual sort of philosophy about Studio Circle Growth’s house Casa de Mi Luna, which adopts local style, sustainable materials – and fun

Studio Circle Growth adopts local style, sustainable materials – and fun

The first ever net zero planning policy by a local authority shows long-term carbon savings and a focus on heat pumps, but issues with compliance, costs and air permeability targets

Bath & North East Somerset initiative shows strong CO2 savings despite cost and compliance problems

The proportion of staff time spent on billable hours is an important contributing factor to profitability

The proportion of staff time spent on billable hours is an important contributing factor to profitability