img(height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=2939831959404383&ev=PageView&noscript=1")

Construction set to miss out on automated future

Words:
Stephen Cousins

Complex tasks and multi-use machinery will require human intervention for a long time yet, say researchers

The dream that one day fleets of high tech self-driving machines will save construction from delays and labour shortages is unlikely to come true, at least in the short term, according to the latest research.

A study of over 30 industry and technology experts, by technology consultancy Arthur D Little, found that building will lag behind other sectors in the uptake of autonomous machines due to the inherent complexity and rugged conditions of job sites.

Hundreds of off-highway vehicles already run driverless in mines, warehouses and other locations worldwide, but the complex and dynamic nature of construction sites, where machines are typically used for a limited amount of time at changing locations, make it the ‘most difficult environment for autonomous technology’.

According to the study, this will minimise the role of autonomous machines in the near future, except in niche applications such as haulage trucks.

Alexander Krug, partner at Arthur D Little told RIBAJ: ‘The autonomous “pioneer” applications of today and the close future all have similar characteristics, many of which are not fulfilled by most construction machinery. They have a high utilisation duty cycle, but construction machines are often multi-purpose and have very low utilisation. They operate in a closed-off work environment, but building sites are complex and dynamic and their machines are only used for a limited time at changing locations.’

He continued: ‘Autonomous pioneer applications require a single and simple work function, but many processes on a construction site require the exact interplay of several machines, which would require automation of the entire process.’

The degree of automation for driving and work functions in an off-highway vehicle is typically differentiated into four distinct levels. According to Krug, the vast majority of vehicles on construction sites for the next 10–15 years will be limited to Level 2 automation and still need a human operator to assist with most functions.

The term ‘autonomous machine’ only applies to Level 3 and Level 4 vehicles that do not require a local operator for most of their regular work. These machines exploit 3D-perception sensors such as LiDAR, radar, and stereo cameras, global navigation satellite system and specific sensors to monitor the custom work functions. Level 3 dump trucks are already used in mining operations and Level 4 autonomy will in future be driven by greater sensor integration and software enhancements.

Fully autonomous machines have the potential to bring numerous benefits to construction, depending on the application, such as 24/7 operation, higher productivity, reliability and predictability. They could reduce labour costs and improve safety by eliminating human error and taking people away from difficult and dangerous work environments.

Key players involved in the development of driverless construction vehicles include manufacturers like Volvo, Komatsu and Caterpillar and specialised robotic companies, for example retrofitters like ASI and Built Robotics.

Widespread uptake of the technology will not be possible, however, until the business case turns positive. According to the report, autonomous machines remain too expensive for the majority of use cases in most industries, mainly due to the cost of high-performance components and systems, including sensors, software and high-performance back end.

Latest

The enormous logistical underworld that brings our goods is drab and invisible. Could architects deliver warehouses we can be proud of?

Could architects deliver warehouses we can be proud of?

Jordan Whitewood-Neal, commended in RIBAJ/Future Architects writing competition, considers whether the AA can reconcile its progressive agenda with its inaccessible building to make disabled inclusion central to architectural education

AA’s progressive teaching conflicts with its inaccessible premises

Danish photographer Hjortshøj continues his exploration of the co-dependencies of natural and urban landscapes in his 2018 photograph of Fondazione Prada in Milan

Rasmus Hjortshøj, Fondazione Prada, Milan, 2018

Visiting is coming back on the agenda, so the right doors, windows and the ironmongery to operate them are more critical than ever. There’s lots of choice on PiP’s specified pages

Doors and windows to serve every post-lockdown need

Do fewer applications mean towers are falling out of fashion? Plus inspector reins in PDR, ‘less urban’ plans for new garden village and Barbican residents question disjointed development. Meanwhile, Italy magics Harry Potter into the built environment

Fewer applications, but approvals rise. Plus PDR extreme checked